Wednesday, March 24, 2021

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FUNCTIONALIZATION AND CEMENTATION UNION TECHNIQUES FOR THE FRICTIONAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTION: ANALYSIS OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND TENSILE STRENGTH | Asian Journal of Research in Biology

 Technical complications, such as gaps in the implant-abutment (IA) connections and abutment retention, may occur when the implant and prosthesis (abutment) are connected. The aim of this research was to examine the IA frictional connection as well as its bond strength when activated with and without cementation. Two groups of IA mounts were assessed using images obtained with a stereomicroscope in an in vitro laboratory experiment. Nine implants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I (GI), which received a conventionally activated attachment ball prosthesis, and Group II (GII), which received dual resin cement before the abutment was activated. Shapiro-Wilk test and F test were used for gap analysis and tensile strength testing, followed by t test. There was a distinction in the gaps between the groups. Despite the fact that Group II's gaps grew in size, its bond strength was greater than Group I's. Even with the increase in gaps, the cementation appears to have affected the increase in bond strength in the implant-abutment relationship.


Please see the link :-
https://www.ikprress.org/index.php/AJRiB/article/view/5553

No comments:

Post a Comment